"to rescue truth from beauty and meaning from belief"

Dynastic Meritocracy vs Meritocratic Dynasty?


Back in Jan 1999, William Safire, he with the sharp pen, asked LKY pointedly about nepotism: ”Would your son be Deputy Prime Minister if he were not your son?” He snaps: ”If he were not my son, he would be the Prime Minister. He came up faster than any of the others, but I told him it would do him no good.”

Mr Safire helpfully concluded, ‘The scion must await his time.’

Fast forward to Apr 2016, the subject has morphed from ‘nepotism’ to one of ‘dynasty’ and what was, at most, an impolite question has mutated into an outright accusation of “the power that be wants to establish a dynasty”. And in place of pensmith William Safire, we have a daughter denied her right by her MSM editors to express her deceased father’s wishes the way she felt best suited. Perhaps, she was reacting to being publicly insulted that ‘reading (her) unedited writings was like sailing through a fog’.

Regardless, 70% of Singaporean voters (at least on) 11 Sep 2015 confirmed LKY’s claim of his son’s right to premiership was more than correct. Now, LKY is no longer here to discuss nepotistic or dynastic politics – which he was expressly dead against. Still, the queasy overhang of nepotism or dynasty persists. It is indeed ironical that it should be his own daughter, his last-days caregiver who should raise the matter anew and so publicly. Then again, perhaps, she must know more than anyone else of what may well be lurking around the corner – or behind close doors, among cold-calculating minds in conference.

It is very fortunate for us that Dr Lee Wei Ling has insisted that she always ‘try [sic] to stick by the truth’. That’s because it’s only when we know the truth that the truth will set us free. Good on her. Good for us. Good for Singapore.


Back to the lurking unease of possible dynasty establishment. In his brotherly, sad, if rebuking response, PM Lee Hsien Loong took a strong stand in reply to the dynasty accusation;

‘The idea that I should wish to establish a dynasty makes even less sense. Meritocracy is a fundamental value of our society, and neither I, the PAP, nor the Singapore public would tolerate any such attempt.’

A very strong denial to a clearly libellous statement levelled at him personally. But we have yet to hear of Dr Lee receiving a letter from Davinder Singh even as she has taken down her offending Facebook revelation.

Since the Singapore education system and mainstream media reporting have hardwired us to think and believe – from seeing the legal actions successfully prosecuted in our own courts over hints and insinuations against the personal integrity of our leaders past and present – any non-action can only leave us wondering about the truth of dynasty.

We can understand that elder brother prosecuting against younger sister is not a Confucian thing. But Singapore’s interest is paramount. Therefore, we hope that at the very least PM Lee will send a lawyer’s cease and desist letter to sister Wei Ling and to demand an unequivocal apology. Via FB will do. No need to feed ST any ad dollar.

Thereafter, since it’s family, he and Singaporeans can then close the case – and (do his favourite thing when something screws up bad) move on.

Would that not be the best course of action for him and, hence, the best outcome not just for him but also for Singapore’s reputation for by-the-book treatment and rule of law?

Dynastic Meritocracy vs Meritocratic Dynasty
On the other hand, if no action is taken, two questions will arise; is there some truth in the accusation and do double standards in the prosecution of libel exist (one for non-family, one for family…by ‘family’, we mean also ‘PAP family’)?

It would then also be reasonable for us to examine further PM Lee’s response, anew and more closely.

‘The idea that I should wish to establish a dynasty makes even less sense. Meritocracy is a fundamental value of our society, and neither I, the PAP, nor the Singapore public would tolerate any such attempt.’

 We can agree that PM Lee has very strongly denied any ‘wish to establish a dynasty’. But that’s different from giving a categorical undertaking that none of his children will ever be part of the PAP ruling elite group going forward.

That should be no surprise. As recent as Dec 2014, PM Lee revealed that “his four children are, ‘at the moment’, not interested to enter politics”.

‘At the moment’…very interesting, isn’t it? Déjà vu? Perhaps. Like Senior Lee once telling Junior Lee. And now, Junior Lee repeating to Junior Junior Lee that “it would do him no good”. So, another scion must again await his time?

Regardless, I do believe that discrimination must not apply either way. Just as non-relatives or strangers should not be discriminated against in any consideration for a position, so blood relations or friends should also not be discriminated against. Who is best suited for a job is what matters i.e. meritocratic considerations should prevail.
Clearly, PM Lee has definitely not rule out, nor rule in, any of his children joining politics. But if any does, he/she is expected to, like him be able to – and be seen to – rise up faster than any of the others.

So, there can be no doubt that meritocracy continues to be alive and be above all else, including dynastic ambitions going forward with regard to any family in politics. That cannot but be a good thing for Singapore.

Still, to outsiders looking in, it’ll be hard to tell, if a long, long time to come in a Singapore far far away, whether Singaporeans continue to be hardwired to just cannot tell if we are living in a Dynastic Meritocracy or a Meritocratic Dynasty.

The prognosis is not good. From what we see of the self-serving elites thrown up by Singapore meritocracy (all thanks and praise to the PAP), there are no eternal ideologies, no eternal heresies, only eternal self-interests. Mr Ngiam Tong Dow is absolutely right. “When you raise ministers’ salaries to the point that they’re earning millions of dollar, every minister — no matter how much he wants to turn up and tell Hsien Loong off or whatever — will hesitate when he thinks of his million-dollar salary. Even if he wants to do it, his wife will stop him.” Proof? After LKY stepped down as PM, no minister or top civil servant has had to resign whether it’s a fearsome, if limping, terrorist who escaped or the occasional NSFer dying or a teenage committing suicide or 2 MRT trainees killed or when 8 innocent citizens who put their trust in our health workers lost their lives (those responsible were not even named, now, that’s real progress!). Meritocracy a al SG50 is either perfected or so thin-skin like the elites it has grown up, so fragile it cannot submit to transparent accountability. And daft citizens continue to vote to support the system as evolved.


So, Dynastic Meritocracy or Meritocratic Dynasty which? If citizens care not, can that be a good thing – come SG100?



3 thoughts on “Dynastic Meritocracy vs Meritocratic Dynasty?

  1. Pingback: Daily SG: 21 Apr 2016 | The Singapore Daily

  2. I only want to comment on one point. There is no need for PM Lee to sue his sister just to prove anything to anyone – this is a family issue and not for political milege whatever might have motivated Dr Lee’s surprised outburst.

    Dr Lee has always been, and she acknowledged it herself times in her articles, that she is strong-headed, eccentric, etc. where even her father could not sway her on certain things. I think some are making too much out of her emotional “pen-lashing”.

    In my view, she was just being her strong-headed, emotional, eccentric, etc. behaviour lashing out at her brother. I thought that her outburst was totally uncalled for. That she finally shut up and removed her artciles tells me that someone (must be someone she trusts and respects) counselled her that her outburst did her (it adversely affected my view of her even though I enjoyed reading all her articles published in Straits Times and respect her to be a honest and good person) and her family no good. It serves only to give ammunition to others / some to level attacks on PM Lee / PAP.

    To me even if PAP and the People’s Association planned LKY’s 1st death anniversary events, there were thousands who genuinely wanted to remember LKY on this occasion and these did it not out of coercion or were like silly lambs led by dynastic plotters or motivators. Remembering LKY on his first death anniversary does not equate hero worship and both Dr Lee and other detractors were not understanding those who participated in it willingly.

    Anyone’s first death anniversary is always poignant to those who loved and respected the deceased.


    • Hi & thank you for sharing your view!

      May I understand what it is that you refer to as ‘a ‘family issue’? For such a prominent family as the Lees, there can’t be that many private family issues, especially when it’s revealed so publicly and on matters that affect citizens, not just the Lee family.

      Dr Lee’s ‘outburst’ revealed at least 2 matters which are anything but just plain vanilla ‘family issue(s)’ One, if the mainstream media is not independent but under some kind of control, then what have we been reading the last 50 years, propaganda masquerading as honest reporting, adulterated info, misinformation etc? Two, her accusation of ‘establishing a dynasty’ is a) libellous beyond reasonable doubt and b) puts in doubt the integrity of SG’s claim to meritocracy and, if true, exposes machinations at the highest levels.

      ‘Outburst’, as you characterise it, or not, Dr Lee is not a silly girl to shoot off her mouth. The reasonable response for us citizens is to ask, does she know something that we do not?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s